Hi all and thanks for the awesome contributions
Thanks for the link! I admit I sincerely do not know what to think of these entries. I like the fact we can view them from https://biii.eu but it seems they serve the purpose of tagging software rather than offer definitions of operations. Most entries related to something simple, like ‘roi-measure’ link to plugins with a description like ‘roi measurement plugin for ICY’ and nothing liked to a description of what is meant by roi measurements. So I have a hard time seeing how people looking to learn about image analysis terminology can locate information there.
That sounds awesome! As well as the ideas for integrations and the inclusion of the imagej.net pages as Discourse topics! I for one would be much more willing to edit Discourse topics and use them to discuss issues/improvements through here when there isn’t a GitHub Issue.
For the topic of a glossary I seem to agree. We notice that a hard first step for people getting into image analysis is figuring out the vocabulary peope in the field are using. And for the people in the field, it can be difficult being consistent due to the fact that different disciplines and softwares use different terms (Regions of Interest, Annotations, Regions, Area of Interest, Zone of Interest, for example).
I obviously have no solution to this but I greatly appreciate the current discussion with all your great minds and hope more people input their opinions, thoughts and ideas!